Going back to the comment made by who was reported to be a young budding journalist who said that the Australian government’s immigration policy did not make sense. “Tough and fair does not go together.” Well every law in Australia has to be tough but fair. It has to be hard on the repeat and/or blatant offender who commits a crime with a disregard of law. But then there are those who might find themselves in front of a judge as victims of circumstance, would you say that they deserve the same penalty having being charged with the same crime? The law in general is tough but has the flexibility of fairness. Immigration law has to be tough but fair, and they are.

Tough but fair does go together and are completely necessary. I don’t know if Rudd pointed this out but I guess me saying it is better late than never. Sorry for the lateness I have been a little pre occupied.

What was the unemployment numbers before 9/11 in the US? Just for kicks that is. Got a terrible feeling that the US is not telling the truth on 9/11 just like most of the Republican crap that came out under George W. Bush. Just for histories sake I wonder what the unemployment stats were before Korea and Vietnam while we are at it? Just a tiny little hunch that I want people to consider, maybe the Arab and Muslim communities hate the US because their beloved free nation falsely accused the wrong people for 9/11. Maybe that is the reason they will not cooperate with giving up their citizens because just like the accusations against me are complete rubbish and just an excuse to cull numbers.

They for one will not get a fair trial on US soil. Hard line terrorists or just honourable victims of the greatest smear campaign since the holy crusades? All they have to do is pay someone to confess, they go missing never to be seen again, the Republicans that authorised the bullshit in Iraq go home and give their crotches a good going over and say job well done. Is this hard to believe? Why? Because the US is free? Free compared to what? Black’s and women have not even had the power to vote until recently and you will sit by and say that your previous governments have been fair and just? This comes from a single man that vetoed every single decision that proved the war in Iraq unlawful, and none of this rings any alarm bells as to who actually was the mastermind? It makes perfect sense as to why the Islamic belief puts up such resistance when the US does not do anything less than crap all over what they believe. “Who cares” they say, we got the nukes and no one else can have them.

I say these things because I am sick of innocent people dying just so some dick head politician does not go to jail for embarrassing the Western world.George W should be sent to the school for the normally challenged.

Freedom? The individual? Small business and enterprise? These freedoms you so lovingly claim comes from where and shown how? By banishing immigrants which is also a form of persecution? Arrogance is when you make stands that are all exactly the opposite of the government, getting slammed in the polls and continuing to do it. These individuals that you ARE persecuting Mr Turnbull, the Sri Lankan refugees that come here for the purpose of freedom of the individual to build the personal enterprise but you would just have them sit in detention to rot or leave them stranded on the ocean. You have no compassion and are an arrogant buffoon.

Creating a fair system for immigration that the UN oversees will reduce the risks involved that refugees face. They will not have to rely on people smugglers, they will be put out of business. The amount of people that end up in Australia would be reduced as the refugee under that type of plan can end up in the best possible place for them which will not always be Australia.

Your pompous wind bagging is arrogant and ignorant of the basic needs of the average struggling man/woman. Your leadership is a farce that your party will use to bare the brunt of. The Federal Oppositions incompetence at having any legitimate stance in opposition and your leadership is showing just that incompetence. They will use and throw you away if your party loses the next election Mr Turnbull. The sad thing is there is no one better in your party and if your the best that they have got well, like they have said on the news not even Jesus can resurrect your party.

Kicking and screaming all the way on climate change? Why? Because you probably never even bothered to read it so you can come up with genuine amendments. What else other reason could you have for being arrogant and stubborn on climate change? Would it be because maybe you do not understand the seriousness of the environment and that it is our nature that sustains us.

Are you saying cut back the stimulus? The same stimulus that you protested against kicking and screaming saying that it would not work? The stimulus package that the government used and stated by Wayne Swan was pre empted on its success so that the actual stimulus is automatically reduced as time goes on, eg time goes on less money is used, more response to stimulus less money is used.

I hope you were not saying that I was arrogant for pointing out a few facts about Christ? I suppose everything the Nazi says is on the level and is in no way arrogant or ignorant nor bigoted and they are perfect?

You could always send Dr Zimmerman to the Oceanic Viking and have him say that they are all mentally ill, he would have them all committed in no time. I think they have made it quite clear that they have a distrust for their current location and that they should bring them to Australia.

Just out of curiosity when has the Liberal party ever had and kept low interest rates?

Did anyone watch the Lebanese Christian on sky Contrarians the other week? I wonder how much money they paid him to say how wonderful the Liberal party is, and I hope more than anything that no one believes them (what a smoke screen). For these simple reasons they have champions of the likes of Costello and Howard. Howard who they champion as an economical contender of value (nowhere near the ability of the common bank teller) who I would safely say would get all happy in his nether regions at the thought of a war with Indonesia, he openly named them as threats for a memorable part of his career and had it as a rumour before getting the boot. A large part of the drongo committee that is Federal Liberal would also love the thought. Thoughts like earthquakes and boat sinking's of refugee's is the Federal Liberal wet dream. I would swear that they pray for it. They are callous barbarians. They do not have any plans for Australia's growth in a positive manner.

All they are is treachery and I would honestly not put murder out of quite a few of them's possibilities. Especially when the Chaser was walking with the then PM Howard. Who openly said (after starting that crap about Hick's) said "I should have picked on someone alive". To me he would say that so once he has had his fun he would be able to kill him and say that he will not be out of jail for another 20 years and just cover it up like they tried to do. The internet will be these cretans undoing.

Then you have Costello Mr "he's undoing everything that I have done". The only reason he complained about the undoing of the surplus was his open statements to the superannuation boards where he begged for the future fund to be untouched till he could get back into power, so that money ever getting to it's rightful owner was going to impossible just like the numerous amounts awarded to me that have not made it to me. They will never. So I got rid of it, if the rightful owner can't have it why should the piggy little moronity that is the legacy of Howard types get it?

They called it the future fund because I did not want the payouts from Longreach for this simple reason. They, even then were planning to steal it. I have had to replace my bank cards regularly from people taking the liberty of trying to spend what little money I do get. So I wanted it when everyone had forgotten me, but the constant accusations from an equally retarded organisation has never left me alone. The QLD police force. I am fairly sure I have stated this quite a few times and am getting sick of repeating myself.

Obama has not had any real impact in the inquiry about Gitmo because I don't believe that some Republicans can be as bigoted as they make out. There would have to be a Nazi element forcing them to say that crap so they can retain some sort of foothold in power (Nazi's). They do it in QLD and QLD so far is nowhere near calling a powerhouse, and that Nazi element are a fairly large factor in power and my run ins with them has shown they like going all JFK to keep their power. But I have faith in Obama, he will work them out and that Nobel peace prize might actually have meaning.

PS. I hate Nazi acts especially when they are done by Jews. Why? Because they try to take the moral ground and fall well short of anything reasonable. They are equally capable of evil deeds.

According to Mr Denis Atkins from today's courier mail, the P.M. is a control freak. How long ago was it the general consensus was that he would not make a decision and needed to be a leader instead of using committees? Wasn't hands on enough?

Now that he is showing leadership and utilising other global institutions to make the hard decisions and go about getting them right is suddenly a control freak? I did not realise in the game of politics that you should show your opposition tolerance when they make bad calls and harp on about how they say they are better when they are clearly not.

The Federal opposition will receive no quarter from me as they pretty much went out their way (admittedly under Howard) to destroy me. When they justified their actions against me as "it is like football if you can not handle it do not play" (paraphrased). A game that I in no way up till recently did not say a thing political except when asked.

They had a ball telling all kinds of B.S. about me when I honestly had no real interest in politics so they pretty much had a field day as I had no means to counter. They brought this on themselves. They will not see any quarter from me.

The Taliban would be well aware of troop increases as a threat that could see them come undone. Not deploying troops too hastily should be seen as an axe hanging over their heads. All this time in between should be seen as time that they can use to really think about things like what is their God going to say and do to them for their actions? Terrorising their own people and forcing them to commit criminal acts is pretty much against the ideas of any true religion. Giving them a chance to think about this could save a lot of lives.

Seeing Al Masri in western politics could go either way he could be seen as selling out his traditional beliefs or what I hope as being seen as the proof that any denomination can be successful in western politics. Islam will only have control of their homelands after they recognise that to truly survive they have to consider the rest of the world and their views without resorting to extremism. The world according to the profit Mohamed can still come to be but not without some sort of agreement with the west.

Saying that I think the real main concern is the drug trades that funds extremist behaviour and the inequality of Afghan citizens. Once there is some sort of guarantee that the Afghan community is going to be peaceful in it's standing in the global community they will be able to contribute to the direction that Afghanistan takes, like the profit of the Koran talks about.

Going back to the ETS there is nothing stopping the coal industry from using the compensation money as well as money from their profits to make coal as clean as it possibly can eg. filters for storing emissions. That will increase coals longevity for a while until eventually the world phases it out completely.

Might be better parked in their mouths. The reason why? This person put out comments that having Obama in power has suddenly made all the African American kids better fighters and white kids had to either sit at the back of the bus or take separate buses. Yes the president has powers but not inhuman super powers that can change people into ultimate fighting champions. How does this person manage to make it as a credible politician and not locked in an asylum somewhere?

Going further into American politics that bomb they are going to make to blow up power stations reminds me of the story about the    'Tall Boy' used against Germany. The British got lucky with that one. But now it has been publicised it will be hard to deny legitimately if used.

Joe Hockey not qualified? Doesn't the Liberal party vote for their leader? A vote that does not directly include the voting public? If he is not qualified to support his leader then who is? what exactly is MR hockey qualified for? Sure the public made it possible for the Liberals to put him in leadership position but the party is the one that has the determining say. It is up to the public to show how much they like the parties decision at the next election. Which I am quite interested in seeing for some strange reason.

How about these words Mr Hockey? Unquestioning, unwavering, undying, undeniable, unending or just continued support?

But unqualified well that probably sums it up right there!

I make no mistake when I acknowledge that the federal coalition ended in surplus, we all know that. The fact that is tied to that surplus are these facts. They invested in a system that collapsed and screwed everyone out of financial security through bad investments and as far as I’m concerned temporary jobs that had no security.

These next points are tied to Howard’s legacy and for some reason he is proud of it. Given the chance that Howard had not of been marched out of his position is this. They would have had to dip into their beloved surplus that serves no real benefit in the coffers, given the current position when it comes to stimulus the unemployment levels would be far higher and we would have been in a nasty recession.

Any two bit manager can penny pinch to stimulus given the power of federal government, big deal a surplus it helps no one in the coffers unless they are invested into assets. Labor is doing that and as far as I am concerned every time he goes and says the same thing about himself over and over again just makes me think why on Earth would you take him seriously as an economic manager?

If it seems like I am shadow boxing well I am in a sense but so far I have a good record of being right and I have kept my distance from political remarks as I am getting sick and tired of the cyber attacks.

Oh yes before I manage to forget again. Howard you insulted the Chinese with you attack on their diplomatic skills you should go find a corner to hide in your history with our Asian neighbours is pretty terrible are you trying to start another war?

How is it that traditional business methods are deemed bribery. It is rarely an occurrence that business deals go through without some sort of sweetener. Dealing with a nationally owned business dealing with resources should have no access to national secrets. Doing business of this level is somewhat of a challenge but calling it espionage has got to be the most outrageous of claims.

But what is most troubling is what exactly is the people of China letting business heads running the business have access to nationally sensitive material that has anything to do with the security of China. It is hard to see as substantial unless of course China is using those resources for military reasons which might explain their attitude to the Australian white paper. Is China building military type projects?

Going back to Australia’s white paper I am guessing from a glance that it was all about Australia’s military presence in the pacific. From what I gather that is to give aid to the island nations that have from time to time types of emergencies like civil unrest that call for Australia’s aid.

Maybe the translation of the paper was misleading and got some levels of concern as to the true intention, but China has pretty much insulted Australia claiming it is an act of war and have suspicions about Mr Hu. I think that he is nothing more than a victim of paranoia.

If anything China should explain as to how does a business deal end up including national secrets?

It would be quite an interesting election on many levels concerning the NSW by-election. I find it hard to believe that voters will be holding Kevin Rudd responsible for the confusion at the state level. When all is said and done you should be voting against the coalition on the grounds that they have opposed everything concerning the economic policies that have worked favourably for the Federal Government.

The last show of desperation from the Liberal party concerning the government and its stimulus spending should not even be considered as worth thinking about. The fact of the matter is that the Federal Government in it’s budget, worked out well. They worked it out on reasonable estimates that in some instances worked out to be to the fact they saved money and could be used elsewhere to hopefully reduce the need for the concern of deficits and debt.

The Liberal party has been wrong in so many instances and by the look of it are quite happy to make nothing more than fools of themselves in the public arena of politics. Personal issues that are not an immediate effect of breaking laws of criminal nature and have no real effect on government policy should not determine how you vote unless that particular individual is in your electorate.

Saying that, as far as the media has shown us the NSW government is trying to work hand in hand with the Federal Government to give the state the very best services it can possibly afford. Voting Labor is the best economic move concerning NSW and for that matter any state.

The thing about Kevin Rudd as P.M. is that he said that he would look after the W.A. concerning mining and it’s exports even though it is no longer considered a Labor state. But hopefully the politicians there will continue to work there, and work positively to make it more like a Labor government that would work in everybody's best interests.

Was I having a mental illness breakdown or was John Howard endorsing the Labor party on sky news? To see such a power house of policy see the reason of the Rudd government acknowledged is by far the most rewarding thing that has happened to legislators, policy makers and strategists of the Rudd government. Doing back flips and not of just the political type mine will be ones of joy.

If only the state Labor parties can get it together maybe things can finally take a better direction. I know that the Liberal party took the stance of strong conservatism and will not deny that the surplus played a small part in economic development of the success of the Federal Labor party. Success that the current Liberal party objected to.

I know it would be next to impossible to get a tax deduction from taxing a premium it just doesn't add up but it should be getting people in the U.S about what are you trying to get for your money in terms of value, what lengths your are going to go to to cover all Americans and most importantly how would you legislate it.

Reinstating the tax that George W gave back to Americans should unfortunately be brought back to maybe fund some short falls to get some of those government services running closer to the way they are needed to be run.

Castro might be onto something. The Taliban are all about religious and moral lifestyles. Things like inaccurate reporting about Osama and the lack of justice for military prisoners and questions about torture methods are their concerns. If Obama can convince them that the U.S. is not all like Cheney they have a better chance at convincing the Afghan people that they are not the bad guys in that war.

Depending on the election decision in Afghanistan would determine if more troops should go. the reasonably low turnout would possibly get lower if security can not be shown on the improve and Afghanis might think then what is the point and the coalition will be on the wrong end of public opinion.

In the cases of Iraq and Afghanistan the public need to be able to be convinced and proven to be able to be kept safe to give their information to prevent the terrorists having anymore success with their bombings. Maybe then the upper hand might be truly gained. The sooner stability is regained the closer the profit Mohammed's prophecy would come to being a reality

Don't tell me that the honourable doctor Nelson is really out of ideas? Or is there a hidden legal complication due to some time as defence minister? Nobody has mentioned anything to me though I am just guessing after all how would I know?

Scared? Well I guess I can't say that by Mr 19% popularity throwing everything into it he can before getting flung out the back door. The thing is throwing out the challenge to the Labor party to run in a Liberal safe seat is a big call. I mean Labor already kicked the previous leader out of his seat and put wall to wall Labor across all the states. The Australian economy dodged recession and is in the best possible shape for a speedy recovery if all keeps on the current path according to the experts.

I think that is a trumping over the coalition if I have ever seen one. Definitely one for the history books.

Rejoice in the voice that is Barnaby Joyce. You want Australia to run on coal forever? Coal fields in Australia though in no time frame soon will run out so why continue to pollute and destroy our backyards? Go nuclear you say? Eventually that will run out too and I don't see you putting your hand up to deal with the nuclear waste that comes from a nuclear power station. Who wants a radioactive back yard? Certainly not me.

The ETS is not just a tax, it applies mostly to those that resist environmentally sound procedures to which they have to pay for. The ETS will be able to create environmental jobs but they can not really be carved in stone until legislation comes into affect. Then with certainty jobs can be made from the scheme.

The opposition to this scheme are wasting valuable time and money. Similar schemes have been started already in other nations. It would have not been a problem to preempt legislation that not only sets targets, encourage new environmentally sound methods and make way for new jobs while protecting the jobs that are already in place like in mining.

Eventually we will have to do something about the environment as the signs of melting glaciers and the diminishing polar ice caps that are affecting sea levels are a real concern. Why not right now? They say prevention is the key, why is it so hard to vote for something that will go to prevent things getting any worse?

The coalition will not get anywhere while they are divided, all they are doing is making themselves look like a bunch of fools that can not agree on anything. What is the point of a political party joining forces when all they do is have differing opinion? It is the silliest thing imaginable, how do they expect to get anywhere honestly?

This is what I would say to the victims of attacks like Lockerbie your governments should reconsider their foreign policy. You can not blame people for retaliating against political oppression. Saying that you will not negotiate with alleged terrorists is just asking for trouble.

America loves the idea of free trade, but went to war to try and gain control of the price of oil. Sounds pretty fair to me what about you? Sell it to us at the price we demand or be crushed by our military. All because they did not want to invest in renewable energies.

I in no way think that violating a nations flag as acceptable behaviour. All I am aiming for is to knock a little shine from certain people’s ego, as that shine seems to blind their logic and ability to deduce fact.

Nothing is more upsetting than losing people that are close to you believe it or not I know that too. But dedicating your life to something like a case like Lockerbie really achieves nothing but causing more misery to yourself.

Redemption, something that I strongly believe in and pray that the rest of the world be open to. If the human race can not change what point is there? Keep fighting until all the bad people are dead? Bad people don’t stick to one side when it comes to war.

Believe it or not I do have a lot of respect for those that take on the difficult life of politics in any nation.

I don’t mind if the Lockerbie bomber goes free. 20 years in jail is close to a life sentence in most legal arenas anyway and I don’t care who you are is no picnic. Denying him saying compassionate reasons don’t apply because he will go back a hero is hardly a reasonable argument. He could have flown to America and took a dump on the American flag and still be a hero to his country. Would you invade and oppress them for that? But what would you say then in the land of free speech? Obviously he would be robbed of that right as he is a foreigner and from what American foreign policy till most recently calls for them to be labelled terrorists and dealt with as such. All because they do not agree with your politics and get no where in the respectable channels.

Considering it happened in Scotland it is up to them. The U.S. can do little about it. He has given no evidence that he knew anybody that would have had to help him and stood by his innocence.

Prostate cancer is hardly worth surviving considering what the male persuasion dedicates himself to in his spare time. Libya put forward compensation for the victims, in American law that would absolve any corporation from any jail time would it not?

Saying that this case is only to get at oil should be nothing to complain about given the history of politicians that you elect that fail to break oils grip on the economy by making renewable energy and ETS a priority. Not voting to make the environment a number 1 concern is victory to the oil companies and in my opinion funds terrorism.

Libya made efforts to carry itself with a certain dignity worthy of recognition on the world stage and each nation willing to do the same should be given similar treatment. Beating them into submission and standing over them is caveman politics worthy of the dinosaurs. Due for extinction.

Watching C-span the other day and I was interested to hear that autism is a disease that needs funding to supply a vaccine to prevent it in the early stages of development. Of course what was most disturbing was the fact that during their research they failed to establish a bench mark to gauge all of their data from. They took it upon themselves to have no case information to compare data from individuals who did not get autism and did not get the vaccine. No big deal right? But there are individuals still getting Autism on the vaccine.

I know I have not got access to the data but in my general knowledge of autism the percentage of people through out history is minimum. Don’t get me wrong I am all for medical science getting it right and curing this disorder (I don’t believe it as a disease as disease rarely gets to a point then stops deteriorating. Disease ends up killing the individual). My brother has autism and he has not deteriorated past a certain point.

From just watching my brother I see that they have certain ways they do things as it is too hard to create new ways. Most out bursts occur when a certain stimulus challenges those ways and they act up in sometimes very dangerous ways. For the most part simple sedatives would be the main way to control these situations until of course they develop resistance to the medication. So now they say a protein can prevent it. That should be good right?

The thing is with that, knowing that a protein can prevent it they should know what protein or lack of it causes it then by that logic cure the disorder in already established cases. But because they give a vaccine that still does not guarantee immunity. Which tells me they still do not know what they are doing and vaccines should not be at the human testing level at least until they can find someone to do it right. I myself would be reluctant to fund such reckless so called scientists.

Moving to Iraq. I know it seems a bit terrible to hear that major attacks are happening to the local population. I know it sounds heartless but it is necessary for this to happen. For example in Iran at the current election the Iranian people took to the streets to voice their opinion as to their objection to the election. If my sources are any good it made the renowned hard liner to a few backward steps to which I would claim a major victory for democracy in Iran. How does this apply to Iraq?

If Iraqis get some motivation behind them and actually get involved in the support of their fledgling government they can organise themselves to take the actions necessary to protect their citizens and for the better part their way of life. Sitting back and watching the U.S. get their hands dirty should by now show that that method will not work. But they still will be required for the success of Iraq by doing like I said embassy roles. The government must endure.

I know the attacks sounds heartless but there are sayings like few are born leaders, most are pushed to become leaders. These attacks should be matched by Iraqis getting involved with the preservation of their elected government. I hear that there economy is struggling and the easiest way for now, is to recruit to policing and military service. Or just sit back and watch their fellow citizens be killed for no real reason. No matter what you think about Iraq the fact still remains Iraqi citizens need to stand up for themselves. Or for another reason the sooner you end the reason to which they say are saying the sooner they will be gone.

Congratulations on not voting for the new judge on America’s questionable legal system. Attacking her saying that she does not follow legislation is a real wondrous piece of rubbish. This from the man that wanted to waive international law to bomb Iran. Iran a country that rose up against the elected president. Tell me again why you wanted to bomb them? Was it because the stereotype of them don’t respect Jews so you voted to cull them?

Make no mistake the Republicans put the most undoubtedly most densest president to date into power and they still hold his values as respectable view points. When you think about what the middle Eastern terrorist are supposed to stand for are you not just killing off the Middle Eastern version of the American Republican? That’s right they can not be Republicans their Middle Eastern (sarcasm).

Attacking much needed American health reform saying that is evil well I expect no less from the likes of Palin. Going to the trouble of setting up a better system for all Americans without raising tax well I guess that is diabolical. I think what Palin and those against health care reform think it is O.K. for people to die for their country and by keeping the working poor of America, the people that keep America going should die because Republicans refuse to be sensible and act for the greater good of all Americans. Palin should take McCain to Alaska and go back to reading every single magazine while shooting at Russia from her back yard.

Palin, you lost the election because Republican hiring policy has shown what type of intellectually challenged people that should never be allowed into positions of power because of the likes of George W Bush. The Republican party should pull its head in and try being sensible for once in their lives.

I guess the Republican party being in opposition is the only way most Republican voters will become rich. I don’t find it hard to believe they pay people to be jerks. After all they voted one to president.

Getting the shipping company to pay more than half for the clean up spill in Queensland is not a bad feat. I just hope that the premier can achieve the same results with her attack on corruption.

Tracing Madeline back to Australia should be a positive thing in hopefully getting her back safe and sound. It would be against the odds given the time period but it has happened before.

A saintly title for another Mary? A first for Australia that I have heard of (I don’t keep track of the later day saints).

Given the circumstances around the North Korean situation Mr Clinton showed if nothing else that North Korea can be reasonable and I think all they really ask for is a little respect.

I do like the Democrats I just find them a little to stand offish when it comes to putting the Republicans in their place. I mean why would Democrats put documents out on their own website on how to sabotage an event that they organised to discuss health care reform? Ahh yet another form of the desperate mind lashing out by the republicans. They already got caught out using a false birth certificate, what else are these borderline criminals capable of?

In all the history of the Republican party wanting to make every day Americans rich, when have they ever put forward legislation to make someone other than the already rich to get rich? I think even Abraham Lincoln after what has happened, gone Democrat.

I am sick of hearing about how the average American is just a little dense. But that is not really the problem, it’s when they get all uptight saying they have a right to opinion because of the first amendment. I am all for freedom of speech but when clowns get on the news for behaving like barbarians voicing an opinion that does not follow any real logic to the problem at hand, makes the rest of the world either laugh at how silly they are or hold an opinion of their own like that of opposition like the so called terrorists in Afghanistan. Yes it is because of people like that, that makes some people not like Americans.

I heard one lady state her opposition to much needed health reform because she said that she did not want to go in front of Obama’s death squad. Can you see what I mean? Universal health care is being implemented so that every single American can get world class health care not just a global debt bill. It is not completely fair that I blame it all on George W’s republican party but I am going to.

Shows like Jay Leno used to show how the average American did not know household famous Americans from history let alone any influential people that shaped the American political scene to what it is today. What does history have to do with it? It gives you hindsight on what to either do or not do next time. This is incredibly important for when you elect a commander and chief that essentially has the power in his hands to not only influence global prosperity but the actual health not just from sickness but unnecessary war maybe of apocalyptic value.

In the home of one of the most renowned place of learning like Harvard I find the objections to the Democrats foolish. You should be walking out on the Republican party. The Republican party completely relies on people not being able to work out the facts (what is important) and voting for the best possible solution. In the eight years that the Republicans held power in America they did absolutely nothing to rectify any problems that they themselves orchestrated in creating. I want George W to go on international television and say how what he did was different to Saddam he cannot say freedom or because he is American. That seems to be the consensus these days for getting away with bad behaviour is justifying it as legitimate because they are American. Just because you are American does not mean that you are the best or that you are right.

I do not follow Mensa in any way as I see them as wastes of space. I have not seen them holding that high of an IQ  and achieving anything substantial either.

Watching CNN still they say robots are the new warfare method. Wouldn’t better world politics that do not rely on killing your opponent save even more lives?